Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Getty Images
Modernizing England’s School Curriculum: New Skills for Today’s Students
The government is set to overhaul the national curriculum in England’s schools, introducing practical financial education such as budgeting and mortgage basics. This initiative aims to equip students with essential life skills alongside traditional academic subjects.
In addition, the updated curriculum will emphasize critical thinking skills to help pupils identify misinformation and disinformation, including content generated by artificial intelligence. This marks the first comprehensive curriculum review in over ten years.
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson emphasized the government’s goal to “revitalize” the curriculum while maintaining a strong emphasis on foundational subjects like English, mathematics, and literacy.
School leaders have welcomed the proposed changes as “pragmatic,” but stress that successful implementation hinges on adequate funding and sufficient teaching staff.
Key Curriculum Reforms and Their Implications
Last year, the government initiated a thorough review of England’s national curriculum and assessment frameworks, aiming to create a “state-of-the-art” educational program that narrows achievement gaps, particularly for disadvantaged students.
Among the major changes is the planned elimination of the English Baccalaureate (EBacc), a performance metric introduced in 2010 that measures schools based on the proportion of students taking core subjects such as English, maths, sciences, geography or history, and a foreign language.
The Department for Education (DfE) criticized the EBacc for limiting subject choices and announced that removing it, alongside reforms to the Progress 8 accountability system, will encourage students to explore a wider variety of GCSE subjects, including creative arts.
However, former Conservative schools minister Nick Gibb warned that discontinuing the EBacc could cause a sharp decline in foreign language study, potentially restricting language learning to private schools and families who can afford private tutoring.
Additional reforms emerging from the review include:
- Integrating financial literacy into mathematics lessons and introducing compulsory citizenship education in primary schools
- Enhancing students’ ability to detect misinformation, with plans to develop a post-16 qualification focused on data science and artificial intelligence
- Reducing the total time students spend on GCSE exams by up to three hours on average
- Guaranteeing that all students have the opportunity to take three separate science GCSEs
- Expanding curriculum content related to climate change and environmental issues
- Improving representation of diverse cultures and contributions within the curriculum
The review also recommended elevating oracy-speaking and listening skills-to the same importance as reading and writing. The charity Voice 21 praised this move as a crucial advancement in fostering effective communication skills among students.
Government’s Selective Adoption and Implementation Strategy
Despite broadly accepting most recommendations, the government has opted not to implement all proposed changes. For example, it plans to proceed with reading assessments for Year 8 pupils but has declined to introduce mandatory English and maths tests for that year group, as suggested by the review.
When questioned about this decision, Education Secretary Phillipson highlighted that students who struggle with reading fluency often face challenges across other subjects, underscoring the importance of targeted support.
Addressing concerns that removing the EBacc might reduce uptake of history, geography, and languages at GCSE, Phillipson argued that the EBacc “has not delivered improved outcomes” or increased language study participation.
She expressed a desire for students to have a broad spectrum of subject choices, including arts, music, and sports, reflecting parental preferences as well.
The government has committed to a careful and phased rollout, providing schools with four academic terms’ notice before the new curriculum becomes mandatory.
Addressing Educational Challenges and Equity
Professor Becky Francis, chair of the curriculum review panel, identified a critical issue faced by students transitioning from primary to secondary education. This period often sees a decline in academic progress, disproportionately affecting pupils from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds.
Francis described the review’s approach as “evolutionary rather than revolutionary,” noting that England’s students already perform well compared to international benchmarks.
She clarified that calls for greater diversity in curriculum content do not aim to remove foundational cultural texts but rather to acknowledge the significant contributions of diverse groups to science and culture, both nationally and globally.
Reactions from Political and Educational Leaders
Shadow Education Secretary Laura Trott criticized the reforms, claiming they weaken students’ understanding of national history and mask declining educational standards. She labeled the changes as “education vandalism” and attributed responsibility to the Prime Minister and Education Secretary Phillipson.
Conversely, Pepe Di’Iasio, General Secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, described the review’s proposals as “pragmatic and evidence-based.” However, he emphasized that delivering a high-quality curriculum requires adequate funding and sufficient numbers of qualified teachers-resources currently lacking in many schools.
Di’Iasio also expressed concern over the government’s introduction of “enrichment benchmarks” aimed at broadening student experiences in civic engagement, arts, nature, sports, and life skills. He criticized the timing and manner of their announcement, suggesting they add to the already heavy demands placed on schools.
Additional reporting by Hope Rhodes
