Table of Contents
Global Landscape of AI Governance in Organizations
Recent research reveals that only about 36% of employees in the United States report their companies have established formal policies regulating the use of artificial intelligence. Across Europe, this figure is slightly lower, with approximately 31% of organizations implementing comprehensive AI governance frameworks. In contrast, in Nigeria, fewer than one-quarter of medium to large enterprises maintain documented AI policies, highlighting a significant gap in regulatory preparedness.
On a worldwide scale, over 45% of companies operate without any formal AI policy, while the remainder are either in the process of developing guidelines or rely on informal practices. This widespread absence of structured AI governance exposes organizations to various operational and ethical risks.
Why Formal Clearance is Essential Before Public Engagement
Imagine being approached by a national broadcaster like NTA for commentary on recent developments in your industry. While the opportunity to share insights is exciting, it is crucial to seek approval from your corporate communications team before responding. Unauthorized statements can conflict with official company positions, potentially jeopardizing your role and the organization’s reputation.
This protocol is not unique to Nigeria; it is a global standard to ensure consistent and accurate messaging. Engaging with media without prior authorization can lead to misunderstandings or misrepresentations that are difficult to rectify.
Media Interaction Policies: A Centralized Approach
Whether your company operates in Abia, Cross River, Taraba, or Borno State, if it is a sizable entity, it almost certainly has a media engagement policy. This policy is designed to centralize communication and prevent conflicting narratives.
Unlike AI governance, which is often fragmented or absent, media policies are typically developed and enforced by a dedicated communications department. This centralized control ensures that all public statements align with the organization’s strategic objectives and legal considerations.
The Rising Importance of Data Privacy Compliance
Historically, many Nigerians underestimated the value of their personal data, often assuming it was freely accessible to large corporations. However, this perception is shifting rapidly as regulatory bodies like the Nigerian Data Protection Commission (NDPC) impose stringent penalties on entities violating data privacy laws.
For instance, recent fines levied against companies in sectors such as banking, entertainment, and social media have reached staggering amounts-up to $32.8 million in some cases. Even a fraction of such penalties can severely damage a company’s financial standing and brand reputation.
Bridging the AI Governance Gap
While most organizations maintain media policies and appoint data protection officers to oversee privacy compliance, the lack of formal AI policies is perplexing. The rapid adoption of AI technologies without corresponding governance frameworks leaves companies vulnerable to data breaches, regulatory non-compliance, legal challenges, and reputational harm.
To address these challenges, industry leaders, regulators, and policymakers will convene at InnovateAI 2026: Responsible AI, Beyond Innovation. This event will provide critical insights into AI governance best practices and offer attendees a CPD-accredited certificate, enhancing their professional credentials.
About the Author
Dotun Adeoye is a seasoned technology entrepreneur and AI governance expert with over three decades of international experience spanning Europe, North America, Asia, and Africa. As co-founder of AI in Nigeria, he advises organizations on AI transformation, ethical governance, and digital innovation strategies.
