Table of Contents
Examining Welfare Usage Among Immigrant Populations in the U.S. by National Origin
On January 4, 2026, former President Donald Trump released a comprehensive analysis detailing the rates at which immigrant households in the United States utilize public welfare programs. Shared through his Truth Social platform, this report sheds light on the percentage of immigrant families from diverse countries who depend on government assistance, reigniting debates on immigration policy and its economic ramifications within the American political landscape.
Understanding Welfare Engagement Across Immigrant Groups
The study, titled “Rates of Welfare Utilization Among Immigrants by Country of Origin,” compiles data from roughly 114 nations and territories. It evaluates the share of immigrant households receiving benefits such as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Medicaid, and other social safety net services. This extensive dataset offers valuable perspectives on how various immigrant communities interact with public welfare systems in the U.S.
Top Countries Exhibiting Elevated Welfare Reliance
Leading the list are immigrants from Bhutan, with an extraordinary 81.4% of households accessing some form of public aid. Yemen follows at 75.2%, Somalia at 71.9%, and the Marshall Islands at 71.4%. Other countries with significant welfare participation include the Dominican Republic and Afghanistan, both at 68.1%, Congo at 66.0%, Guinea at 65.8%, mid-20th century Samoan immigrants (1940-1950) at 63.4%, and Cape Verde at 63.1%. These high dependency rates may highlight economic hardships or integration obstacles faced by these immigrant populations.
Immigrant Communities with Minimal Welfare Utilization
On the opposite end, the data reveals immigrant groups with the lowest engagement in public assistance programs. Bermuda tops this category with only 25.5% of households receiving aid, closely followed by Saudi Arabia (25.7%), Israel/Palestine (25.9%), and Argentina (26.2%). Additional countries with low welfare dependency include unspecified South American immigrants (26.7%), South Korea (27.2%), Zambia (28.0%), Portugal (28.2%), Kenya (28.5%), and Kuwait (29.3%). These figures may reflect greater economic independence or distinct immigration characteristics within these populations.
Placing Welfare Data in the Context of U.S. Immigration Policies
This welfare utilization report emerges amid ongoing discussions within the Republican Party concerning immigration reform, immigrant economic contributions, and the long-term viability of social welfare programs. During his presidency, Trump enacted expanded travel restrictions and reinforced immigration enforcement, aiming to control entry criteria and eligibility. These policies were frequently defended on grounds of protecting public resources and national security interests.
Recent Developments and Policy Considerations
As of 2026, the United States continues to navigate the complex interplay between immigration flows and social welfare demands. Data from the Department of Health and Human Services indicates that approximately 28% of immigrant households nationwide receive some form of government assistance, though this rate fluctuates significantly depending on country of origin and socioeconomic status. Recognizing these variations is essential for lawmakers crafting fair immigration policies that promote integration while ensuring fiscal sustainability.
For instance, contemporary research highlights that immigrants from countries with lower welfare participation often exhibit higher employment rates and educational achievements, thereby contributing positively to the U.S. economy. Conversely, elevated welfare reliance among certain groups may signal systemic barriers such as language proficiency challenges, difficulties in credential recognition, or restricted access to employment opportunities.
